Legal Opinion

Flinn v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1919No. 23,572PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Lawrence Circuit Court; James A. Cox, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Bruce Flinn. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

— Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted in the Lawrence Circuit Court of unlawfully and feloniously committing a rape on a female child under the age*of sixteen years. The crime of which appellant was convicted is defined by §2250 Burns 1914, Acts 1913 p. 267. The overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial is the only error relied on for a reversal of the judgment.' In support of his motion for a new trial his only contention is that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. In this connection appellant earnestly insists that the prosecuting witness is without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shular v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Lieberman v. E. C. DeWitt & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Omans v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Riggs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API