Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
While we are fully aware of the beneficent and salutary rule, to which this court scrupulously adheres in proper cases, that ordinarily questions of diligence and negligence, including proximate cause, are for the jury, we also recognize it to be the duty of the court to determine those questions in clear, palpable, and indisputable cases. Evans v. Georgia Northern R. Co., 78 Ga. App. 709, 712 (52 S. E. 2d 28), and cit.; and this latter rule is frequently enforced as a result of the necessary application of the proper rules of construction to pleadings. “It is an elementary rule of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. FergusonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Moore v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Thomas v. Georgia Granite Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Evans v. Georgia Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Queen v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- McCrary v. Bruno's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Jackson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Finkelstein v. Brooks Paving Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.