Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. Brooks Paving Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 1958No. 58-205PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, CHAS., Chief Judge.

Appellant sued North Bay Village and the contractor and subcontractor engaged in resurfacing its streets, asking damages for personal injuries and property damage which resulted when he drove his automobile onto an obstruction in a street under repair. His complaint was dismissed, on the granting of defendants’ motions for summary judgment, and this appeal followed.

The motions for summary judgment were heard on the pleadings on interrogatories addressed to the parties and the answers thereto, and on a discovery deposition of plaintiff. From these the following…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waldmann v. Skrainka Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  2. City of Jacksonville v. DrewSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
  3. Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Price v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. City of Jacksonville v. BellSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matarese v. Leesburg Elks ClubDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. Coudry v. City of TitusvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Penn v. Columbia Asphalt Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Trantham v. GilliozMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Lopez v. Deatrick Leasing Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API