Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Penwell v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 2015No. 2013-0624PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in this challenge to the denial of an additional award for violation of a specific safety requirement (“VSSR”) in the workers’ compensation system. Relator-appellant, Cathy S. Penwell, challenged the decision of respondent-appellee Industrial Commission when it denied her application for a VSSR award against her employer, respondent-appellee Amanda Bent Bolt Company (“ABB”).

{¶ 2} Penwell alleges that her injuries were caused by ABB’s failure to provide adequate safety restraints under the applicable safety rule. The commission denied…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State ex rel. Frank Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Berry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State ex rel. M. T. D. Products, Inc. v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Camaco, L.L.C. v. Albu (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State ex rel. Levitin v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State ex rel. Universal Metal Products, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API