Commonwealth v. Knox
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Justice:
Jeffrey Knox was convicted by a jury of the offense of criminal conspiracy arising from a prison rape. Post trial motions were denied, and this appeal was taken from the judgment of sentence. We affirm.
Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. In determining the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court is required to consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, accepting all reasonable inferences which the jury could have drawn therefrom. Commonwealth v. Tate, 485 Pa. 180, 182, 401 A.2d 353, 354 (1979).
The essence…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. RichmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. GladdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. MickensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.