Legal Opinion
Trust Fund Services v. Heyman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 21, 1976No. 3135-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.
This action was brought by Trust Fund Services, a nonprofit corporation, as assignee of the Retail Clerks Health and Welfare and Pension Trust Funds, to require Walter Heyman to make certain contributions to a fund it holds for the benefit of his employees. The trial judge decided partially in favor of each party. Heyman appeals and Trust Fund Services cross-appeals. The questions presented concern the existence of and duration of a collective bargaining agreement between Heyman and a labor union and the legality thereof.
In its complaint, Trust Fund Services alleges that Hey-man is party to a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trust Fund Services v. HeymanWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Sheriff v. Medel Electric Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bunch v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Goldies, Inc. v. Alaska Hotel & Restaurant Employees Health & Welfare FundAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Goldies v. ALASKA HOTEL & REST. EMP., ETC.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.