Legal Opinion
Trust Fund Services v. Heyman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1977No. 44335PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
This action was brought in Snohomish County Superior Court to recover payments allegedly due the respondent, Trust Fund Services, as assignee of a union trust fund. The court gave judgment against the employer, Walter Heyman, petitioner here, for sums found to be due under an agreement with the union which he signed in 1971. The respondent was unable to establish to the court's satisfaction a contention that payments were also due under an alleged 1969 agreement.
The petitioner had tendered as a defense to the action a contention that the union did not represent a majority of the employees at…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Retail Clerks Health & Welfare Trust Funds v. Shopland Supermarket, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- West Coast Stationary Engineers Welfare Fund v. City of KennewickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- New Mexico District Council of Carpenters, Afl-Cio v. The Mayhew Company, a New Mexico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Retail Store Employees Local 631 v. Totem Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Audit Services, Inc. v. Elmo Road Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.