Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Town Manager of Southbridge

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 4, 1995No. 94-P-1335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The plaintiff, a retired firefighter in the town of Southbridge, brought this action seeking reinstatement in the town’s group health insurance plan. After a jury-waived trial, a judge of the Superior Court dismissed the complaint, ruling that under G. L. c. 32B, § 9, the plaintiff could not be covered by the plan because he had not been a plan participant at the time of his retirement. On conflicting evidence, the judge found that the plaintiff had not sustained his burden of showing that his request for reinstatement in the plan came before his retirement. We do not construe § 9 as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. WATERTOWN FIREFIGHTERS, L. 1347, IAFF v. WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Brooks v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  3. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Town of ChathamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Municipal Light Commission v. State Employees' Group Insurance CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Donnelly v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Galenski v. Town of ErvingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. Cioch v. Treasurer of LudlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. McDonald v. Town ManagerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Parker v. Town of North BrookfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Michael Cannata v. Town of MashpeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API