Parker v. Town of North Brookfield
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelinas, J.
Sheryl Parker, employed by the town of North Brookfield (town) as “dog officer/animal control officer,”1 was discharged effective July 1, 2004, when her position was eliminated and moved to the police department. As a town employee, Parker was eligible to obtain health insurance benefits *236from the town pursuant to G. L. c. 32B. However, when she requested enrollment in the town’s insurance plan upon commencement of the new fiscal year, the town terminated Parker and eliminated her position. The town made this decision purely on the basis of avoiding the cost of providing her with insurance.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- King v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mercado v. Manny's T.V. & Appliance, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Staveley v. City of LowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008