Legal Opinion

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Town of Chatham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 16, 1989PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, Local No. 59 (Teamsters), is the certified collective bargaining agent for all regular full-time police officers on the Chatham police department, excluding the staff sergeant, lieutenant, and chief. The Teamsters offers its members a health and welfare plan which provides indemnity-type group health insurance benefits (Teamsters plan). This plan is considered a benefit of Teamsters union membership, and the police officers have asked Chatham to contribute to the plan and to allow them to participate in it.

*366Since April, 1985, Teamsters has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. WATERTOWN FIREFIGHTERS, L. 1347, IAFF v. WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Reilly v. School Committee of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. School Committee v. DupreyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Swampscott Education Ass'n v. Town of SwampscottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Hemman v. Harvard Community Health Plan, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. President & Fellows of Harvard College v. PECO Energy Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  2. Ludlow Education Ass'n v. Town of LudlowMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Connors v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Cioch v. Treasurer of LudlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. Kusy v. Town of MillburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API