Legal Opinion

Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1958No. 387PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Defendant’s only assignments of error are based on its exceptions to the overruling of its motions for judgment of nonsuit. The only motion to be considered is that made by defendant at the close of all the evidence. G.S. 1-183; Murray v. Wyatt, 245 N.C. 123, 128, 95 S.E. 2d 541.

While the record is silent as to the ground (s) on which defendant based its motion for judgment of nonsuit when it was considered and overruled by Judge Gwyn, defendant asserts here a fatal variance between plaintiffs’ allegata and probata as the ground on which its motion should have been allowed, citing Andrews v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Eller v. Board of Education of Buncombe CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Dennis v. City of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Lassiter v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Guilford Realty & Insurance Co. v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. North Carolina v. HudsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
  3. Drum v. BisanerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Glace v. Town of Pilot MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Ivery v. IverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API