Legal Opinion

Ivery v. Ivery

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1963No. 241PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Defendant’s Assignments of Error Nos. 1 and 5 are based on his exceptions to the overruling of his motions for judgment of nonsuit. The only motion to be considered is that made by defendant ■at the conclusion of .all the evidence. G.S. 1-183; Spaugh v. Winston-Salem, 249 N.C. 194, 105 S.E. 2d 610.

The evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, was sufficient to support a finding that Paul F. Ivery, deceased, at the time of the marriage ceremony on May 12, 1960, was mentally incapable of contracting a valid marriage. Indeed, defendant does not contend otherwise.

Defendan…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Pridgen v. . PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Lea v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Koonce v. . WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
  5. Taylor v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fulton v. VickeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. Cunningham v. BrigmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Mussa v. Palmer-MussaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API