Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nayberger v. McDonald

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, J.

This is a proceeding for contempt, which, it is claimed, occurred by disobedience to an order of the court authorizing the receiver to take possession of certain effects of one of the defendants, and arising out of the following circumstances.

It appears from the complaint that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of certain notes executed 'by the defendants John F. McDonald and Mary B. McDonald to Russell E. Butler, and later assigned to the plaintiff and another, and by certain transfers and assignments finally becoming the property of plaintiff. The plaintiff brought this suit to foreclose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hazeltine v. GrangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Couper v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
  3. Farm Mortgage Loan Co. v. PettetNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Fifth National Bank v. PierceMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Investors Syndicate v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Blackwell v. BlackwellOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Polygon Northwest Co. v. NSP Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Chapman v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API