St. Louis, S. F. R. Co. v. Houston
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from, Caddo County Courtj W. W. Vaughan, Judge. Action by Wm. Houston against the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
The petition alleged in substance that the plaintiff, defendant in error here, was loading a car belonging to the defendant, plaintiff in error here, with cotton seed, which ear had been placed on the defendant’s side track by the defendant for loading, and that while loading said car he was' at a place where he bad a right to be. That while so loading said car, the defend ant wantonly, negligently, and carelessly van a passenger train into plaintiff’s team, which at that time was hitched to the plaintiff’s wagon, from which he was unloading said cotton seed into the defendant’s car. That at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- John v. PaullinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nichols v. Canoga IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Porter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Dunn v. Modern Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.