Legal Opinion
Beardsley v. Beardsley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 26, 1957PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
On June 25, 1951, the plaintiff obtained a decree of divorce from the defendant in the Superi- or Court in Fairfield County. The decree included orders for the payment of alimony and of support for a minor child, each in the amount of $20 a week. The defendant failed to make all of the payments, and this action is brought to secure a judgment for the accrued arrearage under both orders, in accordance with the rule of cases such as German v. German, 122 Conn. 155, 158, 188 A. 429.
The defendant claims that the awards of alimony and support are without validity since service in the divorce…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- German v. GermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Receivers Middlesex Banking Co. v. Realty Investment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Samson v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. LicariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- State v. DeGennaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Johnson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.