Legal Opinion

Puppo v. Larosa

California Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1924No. S. F. No. 10911PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

This appeal relates to matters arising out of the attachment referred to in the opinion of the court in Puppo v. Larosa, ante, p. 717 [230 Pac. 439]. It is an appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion to strike from the files an amended memorandum of costs and disbursements, and also from an order denying his motion to tax costs.

The original cost bill as filed by plaintiffs contained items in the aggregate amount of $562.85. The defendant filed notice that he was dissatisfied, and excepted to all the items in the bill, and that he would, on a day stated, move to have the costs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Puppo v. LarosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Barnhart v. KronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Burnham v. HaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. DumrichobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Von Goerlitz v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Dodge v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Pan Pacific Properties, Inc. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Whitney v. WhitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API