Barnhart v. Kron
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County denying a motion to retax costs. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff moved the court below to retax the bill of costs filed by the respondent, by striking out each and every item thereof, upon the ground that none of said items were incurred by the respondent in maintaining or establishing any part of his defense to the action, but that each of said items was so incurred *449by his co-defendant. The court denied the motion, and the plaintiff has appealed.
The allowance or disallowance of items for the expenses and disbursements incurred upon the trial of an action must be left in nearly every instance to the discretion of the judge before whom the…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. BarenfeldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Kramer v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Mojave and Bakersfield Railroad v. CuddebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Puppo v. LarosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.