Legal Opinion

Carter & Burgess Inc. v. Yasameen Sardari

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 14, 2011No. 01-11-00667-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL MASSENGALE, Justice.

In this interlocutory appeal, the architectural firm Carter & Burgess, Inc. challenges the trial court’s order denying its motion to dismiss. C & B contends that a certificate of merit was required by Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 150.002, but plaintiff Yasameen Sardari failed to file a certificate of merit in support of her claims against C & B. Sardari contends that no certificate of merit was required because her tailored allegations of negligent project management relate to the actions of an unlicensed employee and therefore did not arise out…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Curtis & Windham Architects, Inc. v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. TDIndustries, Inc. v. Rivera, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. Capital One, National Ass'n v. Carter & Burgess, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. CBM Engineers, Inc. v. Tellepsen Builders, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  2. TIC N. Central Dallas 3, L.L.C. v. Envirobusiness, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  3. Pelco Construction, Inc. v. Dannenbaum Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  4. Jennings, Hackler & Partners, Inc. v. North Texas Municipal Water District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
  5. Barron, Stark & Swift Consulting Engineers, LP and Barron-Bennett Architecture, LP v. First Baptist Church, Vidor, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API