Legal Opinion

Clark v. William Munroe Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1901Published

Error to Wayne; Waite, "J. Replevin by Arthur J. Clark against the William Mun-roe Company, impleaded with William Munroe. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff replevied a quantity of lumber from the defendant company, and upon the trial obtained a verdict and judgment against it for the property replevied, and for $270, to cover property mentioned in the writ and not found. The court directed a verdict of not guilty as to Munroe, and set aside the judgment to the extent of the $270 damages. The company has appealed.

Plaintiff asserts that on or about December 5, 1898, he had some negotiations regarding the sale of some lumber with William Munroe, and that in accordance with an arrangement then agreed upon, and in reliance upon certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Skinner v. Michigan Hoop Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kirschbaum v. JassponMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API