Legal Opinion
Skinner v. Michigan Hoop Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error to Saginaw; Snow, J. Replevin by Myron Skinner against the Michigan Hoop Oonipany and Melvin O. Robinson. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
In August, 1890, the Michigan Hoop ■Company, a corporation doing business at Saginaw, *468agreed to sell, upon commission, all hoops consigned to it by the plaintiff. The parties dealt for a time under this agreement. On February 11, 1897, the defendant wrote the following letter to the plaintiff:
“Saginaw, Mich., February 11,1897.
“Myron Skinner,
“West Point, Ky.
“Dear Sir: We have arranged for storage at Detroit, and can take a good many hoops, if you can buy them. We do not want many syrup hoops, but can take one or two cars. We want mostly pork and tierce hoops. We will pay the following prices:…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Starr Bros. v. StevensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Stubly v. BeachboardMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Dayton v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Pangborn v. RuemenappMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Robinson v. Fairbanks & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elbro Knitting Mills v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Ford v. C. E. Wilson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Plas v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Weidman v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Maupin Warehouse Co. v. FlemingOregon Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.