Legal Opinion
State v. Gault
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 20, 1996No. C2-95-2482PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
The State of Minnesota appeals from the district court’s order dismissing misdemeanor complaints against respondents and suppressing evidence. The district court ruled that the state failed to meet its burden of showing that the prosecution and the evidence were not tainted by the use or derivative use of respondents’ compelled self-incriminatory statements. The state also appeals from the district court’s dismissal of the complaints in the interests of justice under Minn.Stat. § 631.21.
FACTS
This case arises from an incident that allegedly occurred at the Hennepin County…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AllardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- State v. CARAPEZZASupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. BeardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998