Legal Opinion

State v. CARAPEZZA

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 2012No. 101,958, 101,959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

Marcy Faith Carapezza and Jason Cole Hughes (collectively referred to as defendants) were convicted of felony murder and other felonies. Following decisions by this court remanding the cases for new trials, the district court suppressed certain evidence as being derived from the defendants’ immunized inquisition testimony. The State of Kansas takes interlocutory appeals from the district court’s suppression orders, contending that the district court applied an incorrect burden of proof and that the State did not make an improper use of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Chavez v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. State v. BoothbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. Northwestern v. PSCMontana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API