Legal Opinion

Logan-Baldwin v. Morningstar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: The latest date upon which defendants treated plaintiff Emmelyn Logan-Baldwin was October 19, 1984, when defendant Dr. Morning-star examined plaintiff for the last time without scheduling a future appointment (see, Massie v Crawford, 78 NY2d 516; Rizk v Cohen, 73 NY2d 98, 103; Richardson v Orentreich, 64 NY2d 896, 898; McDermott v Torre, 56 NY2d 399, 405). The evidence upon which plaintiffs rely to establish continuing treatment after that date is insufficient as a matter of law (see,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Massie v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Rizk v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Richardson v. OrentreichNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Cooper v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Logan-Baldwin v. MorningstarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API