Department of Highways of Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.:
I am obliged to dissent in this case as the majority opinion would permit the diversion of the Motor License Fund without any authorization by the Legislature and contrary to Article IX, §18 of the Constitution.
I find no power or authority in the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to impose upon the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania a portion of the cost of relocating utility facilities which are located on a public highway at a highway-railroad crossing. Sections 409 and 411 of the Public Utility LaAV, 66 PS §§1179, 1181, contain no such authority. Such…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Westmoreland Chemical & Color Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.