Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 31, 1957No. 4592PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following answer was returned:

To the Honorable Senate:

The undersigned Justices of the Supreme Court submit the following answer to the question contained in your resolution filed May 9, 1957, with reference to Senate Bill No. 129, entitled “An Act relative to the federal aid highway act of 1956.”

*528Under the proposed bill the State will pay the cost of relocating utility facilities necessitated by the construction of the “national system of interstate and defense highways” under the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, on a matching basis. The bill provides that the utility shall relocate its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. New York City Tunnel Authority v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court Given Under the Provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the Constitution Question Propounded by the Senate in an Order Dated April 24, 1957Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  4. City of Springfield v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Detroit Edison Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Appalachian Power Co. v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Rich v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. WentzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API