Legal Opinion

White v. Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1936No. 3448PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

The briefs present no point in behalf of the executrix and as to her the judgment is manifestly correct.

The assignment complaining of the overruling of the plea of privilege need not be separately considered. The notes were payable in Martin county, and the venue was properly laid in that county, if the notes were valid obligations of the firm of White & Tom.

The same is true of the assignment relating to the appellants’ cross-action for such cross-action is without merit, if the notes sued upon are valid obligations of the partnership.

The evidence abundantly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Randall, Sawyer & Dyer v. Merideth & AilmanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Miller v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Dobie v. Southern Trading Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Fort Dearborn National Bank v. BerrottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Smith v. OvertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API