Legal Opinion

Fort Dearborn National Bank v. Berrott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from El Paso. Tried below before Hon. A. M. Walthall.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

Appellant instituted suit against George Berrott and Ben Schuster, doing business under the firm name of Berrott & Schuster. The suit was subsequently dismissed as to Schuster. Berrott pleaded non est factum, and that the note was executed by Ben Schuster without his knowledge or consent, and was not executed for any debt due by Berrott or his firm, and that said note was indorsed to appellant after its maturity. The cause was tried by jury, and a verdict was instructed for appellee.

It was proved that George Berrott and Benjamin Schuster composed the firm of Berrott &…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tempel v. DodgeTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Word v. ElwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Clark v. GillespieTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Lancaster National Bank v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Burgess v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burns v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Douglass v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Ford v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. White v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API