State Ex Rel. Hagen v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The legislature, at its biennial session of 1919, passed an act to regulate and license the practice of drugless therapeutics in the state of Washington. (Laws of 1919, ch. 36, p. 61) [Rem. Comp. Stat., § 10112], Generally, the act created a hoard of examiners, empowered the hoard to pass upon the qualifications of persons desiring to practice the art named, and further empowered it to issue licenses to so practice to those whom it finds to he qualified. The third section of the act prescribes the qualifications necessary to be possessed by an applicant for a license. Three different methods…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Tellevik v. Real Property Known as 31641Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Chelan Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Carpenter v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.