Legal Opinion

Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Norviel

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1926No. Civil No. 2281PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Superior Judge.

— In its motion for rehearing the United Verde Copper Company, appellee, insists that the former opinion of this court sets aside and utterly disregards the Water Code of Arizona, which is found at chapter 164, page 278 and following, Session Laws of 1919, and the amendments thereto, being’ chapter 64 of the Session Laws of 1921. We fail to see the viewpoint of the appellee. Instead of setting aside the Water Code, the opinion of the court is entirely in harmony and accord with the Water Code. The fourth and fifth propositions urged by the appellee in its original…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beach v. Superior Court of Apache CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Smith v. TrottArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Funk v. BartholetWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Daniels Irrigation Co. v. Daniel Summit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hurley v. AbbottDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API