Legal Opinion

Smith v. Trott

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1930No. Civil No. 2811PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

Edward Smith, hereinafter called appellant, in 1925 applied to' the water commissioner of the state of Arizona under chapter 164, Session Laws of 1919, as amended (Laws 1921, chap. 64), and commonly called the Water Code, for a permit to appropriate certain waters from Date Creek at a point known as Tres Alamos Canyon, situated about twenty miles west of Congress Junction. Immediately following the filing of this application, Wid T. Sawyer, hereinafter called appellee, filed in the office of the commissioner a protest against its allowance. A hearing was duly held before the commissioner, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barth v. County of ApacheArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Mohave County v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Navajo-Apache Bank & Trust Co. v. DesmontArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Stuart v. NorvielArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PhelpsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State Tax Commission v. Miami Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Cty. of Pima v. State Dept. of Revenue, Etc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Beach v. Superior Court of Apache CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City of Phoenix v. SUPERIOR COURT, CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API