Legal Opinion
Citizens Insurance v. Harris
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1886No. 13,371PublishedCited by 9 opinions
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
No demurrer was filed to the appellee^ complaint at the special term, and the specification in the as*393signment of errors, that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint, has no foundation.
Filed Dec. 9, 1886.
The case is not within the statute concerning agreed cases, for it is an ordinary action at law with' an agreement as to the facts. There is an essential difference between an agreed case and a case where the trial takes place upon an agreed statement of facts. Oppenheim v. Pittsburgh, etc., R. W. Co., 85 Ind. 471, see p. 477 and authorities cited; Zeller v. City of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Oppenheim v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Pennsylvania Co. v. NiblackIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Zeller v. City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Bank of Commerce v. PickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Witz v. DaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Morrison v. MorrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Wright v. SheltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Aubain v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.