Legal Opinion
In re Lucent Technologies, Inc., Securities Litigation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 26, 2000No. CIV.A. 00-621(AJL)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action for securities fraud brought on behalf of purchasers of Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Lucent”) common stock (“Lucent Stock”), seeking damages for violations of Section 10(b)(“Seetion 10(b)”) and 20(a) (“Section 20(a)”) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as *141amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78t(a), and Rule 10-b (“Rule 10 — b”) promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. Damages are sought from Lucent, Richard A. McGinn (“McGinn”) and Donald Peterson (“Peterson”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). Jurisdiction is alleged…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re: Cendant Corporation LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Employers-Teamsters Local Nos. 175 & 505 Pension Trust Fund v. Anchor Capital AdvisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Cheney v. CyberGuard Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- Newby v. Enron Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- In Re Razorfish, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.