Legal Opinion
In re Ampal-American Israel Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 27, 2015No. Case No. 12-13689 (SMB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GRANTING TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO RETAIN TARTER KRINSKY & DROGIN LLP AS COUNSEL AND DENYING CROSS-MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE TRUSTEE
STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge:
Alex Spizz, the chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”) of Ampal-American Israel Corporation (“Ampal”), has moved to retain the law firm of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP (“Tarter”) as substitute general bankruptcy counsel under 11 U.S.C. § 327(a). The Trustee recently joined Tarter as a partner together with four other lawyers and one paralegal from his previous firm, Spizz Cohen &…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- In Re Arochem CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- In Re RobertsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
- In Re Granite Partners, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Matter of Carla Leather, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maiman v. SpizzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Merhav Ampal Group, Ltd. v. Merhav (M.N.F.) Ltd. (In re Ampal-American Israel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In re BarkanyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- In re: Eric R. BravermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2026