Legal Opinion

Dennison v. Waterville Cutlery Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1908PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action to enforce the delivery of shares of capital stock, and to recover damages for breach of contract, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, Gager, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiffs requested the trial judge, to make a finding of facts, and, after the finding had been filed, instead of proceeding to have the same corrected, under §§ 794, 795 and 796 of the General Statutes, they caused the entire evidence and rulings in the case to he certified as a part of the record, pursuant to General Statutes, § 797.

Among the reasons of appeal they assign as error the refusal of the judge to find certain facts as requested, and his finding, without evidence as they claim, of certain other facts. A correction of the finding is not asked for either in the reasons of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boughton v. BoughtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farrington v. CheponisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  2. Hellman v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. CambellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Summa v. DereskiawiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  5. Churchill Grain & Seed Co. v. F. B. NewtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API