Legal Opinion
Kennecott UT Copper v. United Steelworkers
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1999No. 98-4045PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation seeks to overcome one of the most demanding- standards in American law: that defining when a court may vacate a labor-arbitration award. Kennecott appeals the district court’s refusal to do so. The arbitrator issued an award upholding a grievance which challenged a Kennecott rule that employees must report 20 minutes before their shift to be transported to their work sites. After the arbitrator had issued the award, a union representative contacted him ex parte. The arbitrator then sent the parties a letter for the stated…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Utah Animal Rights Coalition v. Salt Lake City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- City of Albuquerque v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Eastern Seaboard Construction Co. v. Gray Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Copar Pumice Co., Inc. v. TidwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- International Ass'n of Machinists Workers, Local Lodge 964 v. BF Goodrich Aerospace Aerostructures GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.