Legal Opinion
International Ass'n of Machinists Workers, Local Lodge 964 v. BF Goodrich Aerospace Aerostructures Group
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 2004No. 03-55085PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.
We must decide whether provisions of a collective bargaining agreement requiring a corporate employer to pay salary and benefits to a full-time union representative violate the federal Labor Management Relations Act.
I
BF Goodrich Aerospace Aerostructures Group (“Goodrich”) and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 964 (“the union”) are longstanding parties to a collective bargaining agreement (“the agreement”).1 Pursuant to the agreement, union members elect a “Chief Shop Steward” who continues to draw his salary and benefits…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Johnson v. Rancho Santiago Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Cleveland v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Reswick v. Reswick (In Re Reswick)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Clark v. Capital Credit & Collection Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Maria Hernandez v. Williams, Zinman & Parham PcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.