Espinoza v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of murder, and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the State penitentiary.
The first objection is to the action of the court in permitting Andres Romero to testify. Andres Romero was indicted, charged also with the commission of the offense. The State’s theory was that the fatal wound was inflicted by appellant by stabbing deceased in the back. There was evidence that Romero stabbed deceased also in the front. Romero plead guilty of assault to murder, and his punishment was assessed at two years-confinement in the State penitentiary, hut…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Snodgrass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Snodgrass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Atkinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Herrington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- McLaughlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- La Fitte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.