Legal Opinion

Neil v. Mayer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1968No. 32534PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL E. SEMPLE, Special Judge.

Plaintiff sued for $15,000 damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of an automobile collision. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $12,000. Defendant appeals from the judgment rendered on the verdict.

The case was submitted to the Jury on three specifications of negligence which were failure to keep a careful lookout, defendant was following plaintiff’s vehicle too closely and on the so-called rear end collision doctrine. Defendant’s principal assignments of error are that there was insufficient competent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. Central States Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. Probst Ex Rel. Probst v. SeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. Lohmann v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Zeigenbein Ex Rel. Zeigenbein v. ThornsberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Clevenger v. WaltersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thienes v. Harlin Fruit CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Comerio v. Beatrice Foods Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
  3. Wagoner v. HurtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Gaynor v. HorwitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Deck & Decker Personnel Consultants, Ltd. v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API