Legal Opinion

Wagoner v. Hurt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1977No. 10259PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

Defendant Jack Hurt’s automobile collided with a vehicle being driven by plaintiff Charles Wagoner. Claiming severe personal injuries, plaintiff brought this action for damages. Upon trial a jury found for the plaintiff and assessed his damages at $15,-000. Defendant appeals. Two questions are presented. The first is whether the plaintiff’s case was properly submitted under the “rear-end collision” doctrine; the second is whether the jury was prejudicially misinstructed upon the issue of liability or upon the issue of damages. The answer to the first question is yes; the answer…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Jones v. Central States Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Hughes v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Barlow v. ThornhillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mueller v. StorbakkenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Nieves López v. Rexach BonetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1989
  3. Jenkins v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Weinbauer v. BerberichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Burns v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API