Gaynor v. Horwitz
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Commissioner.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of $5000 awarded in accordance with a jury verdict in an automobile accident case. Defendant’s attack is on the sufficiency of the evidence to support the giving of plaintiff’s verdict directing instruction, (MAI 17.16) allowing recovery under the rear-end accident • doctrine. Defendant also challenges the damage instruction on the basis it allowed the jury to assess future damages and the evidence failed to establish permanent damages.
Plaintiff’s testimony established that he was driving in the underpass on the Third Street Highway in St.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hughes v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Witherspoon v. GuttierezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Harrison v. WellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Todd v. PresleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Young v. Frozen Foods Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Forbis v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Beulah Wichmann v. United Disposal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Chaussard v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- McDowell v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Jensen v. PappasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.