Legal Opinion

Matter of Yetman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 12, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court recommending that JOHN P. YETMAN, JR., of MOUNT HOLLY, who was admitted to the Bar in 1976, be publicly reprimanded: 1) for his gross negligence and lack of due diligence in violation of DR 7-101(A)(l) and (2) and RPC 1.1(a) and 1.3, in his representation in an estate matter, 2) for his failure to communicate with his client, in violation of DR 7-101(A) and RPC 1.4(a), and 3) for his failure to comply with his promise made at an ethics committee hearing, to turn over the file to a new attorney without delay, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. In Re NigohosianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. In Re GoldstaubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. In Re StoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. Matter of SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ziegelheim v. ApolloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  3. In Re KivlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. In re SegalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. Smith v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API