Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 9, 1974No. 7328SC648PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

The single question presented by this appeal is whether all partners in the law firm are liable for a malicious prosecution instituted upon the advice of one of the partners but without the participation, authorization, knowledge, or approval of the other partners. The trial court has denied such vicarious liability and granted summary judgment for the defendant partners who were not personally involved. In our view this decision is correct and is affirmed.

G.S. 59-43 provides: “Where, by any wrongful act or omission of any partner acting in the ordinary course of the business of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noblett v. BartschWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Marks & Co. v. HastingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Rosenkrans v. Barker.Illinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Bowen v. W. A. Pollard & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Priddy v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chidnese v. ChidneseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Goodman v. Holmes & McLaurin Attorneys at LawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Red Carpet Corp. v. RobertsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Shelton v. FairleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. McDonough v. KenistonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API