Nghiem v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Phillip Nghiem brings this putative class action against Defendants Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (“DSG”), and Zeta Interactive Corporation (“Zeta”) for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. §§ 227 et seq. (See Dkt. 33 [First Amended Complaint, hereinafter “FAC”].) Before the Court is Nghiem’s motion for class certification. (Dkt. 71 [hereinafter “Mot.”].) For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED.
II. BACKGROUND
Nghiem is a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lowe v. Maxwell & Morgan PCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Charvat v. Tomorrow Energy Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Gordon v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Kevin Risto v. Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio ArtistsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Maney v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.