Legal Opinion
CARCAMO v. Miami-Dade County
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided September 3, 2003No. 02-20870-CIVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY’S MOTION TO DISMISS
UNGARO-BENAGES, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Miami-Dade County’s Motion to Dismiss, filed July 22, 2008.
THIS COURT has considered the motion, the pertinent portions of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Plaintiff began this action on April 10, 2003. On July 3, 2003, Plaintiff, with leave of Court, filed a four-count second amended complaint (“Complaint”) challenging, inter alia, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Defendant Miami-Dade County’s (“Defendant”) practice of impounding…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Francis Carcamo v. Miami-Dade Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Barcena v. Department of Off-Street ParkingDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007