Legal Opinion
Francis Carcamo v. Miami-Dade Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 29, 2004No. 03-15304PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Francis Cárcamo (“Appellant”) brought suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against, inter alia, Miami-Dade County (“County”) claiming that the County violated her procedural due process rights. The district court granted the County’s motion to dismiss in a thorough opinion applying the analysis set out in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 96 S.Ct. 893, 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976); we agree with the district court’s analysis, and adopt its opinion which has been published in 284 F.Supp.2d 1362 (S.D.Fla.2003).
Although we adopt the district court’s opinion, we address one argument asserted by Appellant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- McKinney v. PateCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- National Ass'n of Boards of Pharmacy v. Board of Regents of the University System of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Gloria Ellis v. Michael Sheahan, Sheriff of Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- MacFall v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- KTK Mining of Virginia, LLC v. City of SelmaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
- Anderson v. City Of PrichardDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.