State v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant’s counsel concedes that the trial court’s findings on voir dire were supported by competent evidence, and on this appeal he does not attack the admissibility of the confession. His sole contention is that there was insufficient evidence aliunde the confession to warrant submitting the case to the jury. In this contention we find no merit.
The proof of every crime consists of (1) proof that the crime charged has been committed by someone and (2) proof that the defendant is the perpetrator of the crime. The first element is the corpus delicti; the second is defendant’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. MacOnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. JensenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. KrausCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977