Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1987No. 410 and 434PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In these cross-appeals from final judgment in an action to quiet title, there are two principal issues. The first concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to establish title by adverse possession of a tract of dense woodland; the second concerns the weight to be given to the amount of acreage recited in a deed when it is at variance with the actual acreage enclosed within the specific boundaries defined in the deed description. The trial court held that barricading a road leading into the tract of woodland, together with sporadic use of the tract, was inadequate to establish…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. KlingensmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Parks v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Inn Le'Daerda, Inc. v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Dowdle v. WheelerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Robin v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Moore v. DuranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Bride v. Robwood LodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Barter v. Palmerton Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Bruzgulis, S. v. Landowners WildlifeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API