Legal Opinion
Walling v. Alaska Pacific Consol. Min. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 19, 1945No. 10905PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
At the time the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 1 became effective, appellee, hereinafter referred to as the Company, put in operation a so-called split shift plan. Appellant, hereinafter referred to as the Administrator, challenging the legality of said plan, brought an action in the District Court seeking to enjoin the Company from operating thereunder. The injunction was refused and the Administrator appeals.
The Company," as its name implies, was engaged in the mining business. It operated a gold mine in the Talkeetna Mountains, 70 miles from Anchorage, Alaska. It is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. RosenwasserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- E. L. Cord, Etc. v. Calvin J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Keun-Jae Moon v. Joon Gab KwonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Matteo Brunozzi v. Cable Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Valley Towing Co., Inc., a Corporation and Robert DyarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Vaughan v. BowerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.