Legal Opinion
Matteo Brunozzi v. Cable Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2017No. 15-35623, 15-35744PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORSEY,-District Judge:
Matteo Brunozzi and Casey McCormick worked as technicians for Cable Communications, Inc. (CCI) installing cable television and internet services. They filed separate lawsuits against CCI alleging that the company’s compensation plan violates the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 207, and Oregon’s statutory requirement that an employer pay all wages earned and unpaid after terminating an employee, ORS 652.140. Brunozzi additionally alleges that CCI violated Oregon’s laws prohibiting discrimination against a private employee…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Janell Howard v. City of Coos BayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Sean Hoard v. J. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Duncan Parking Technologies v. Ips Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Midbrook Flowerbulbs Holland B v. v. Holland America Bulb Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Eat Right Foods Ltd. v. Whole Foods Mkt. Servs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.