Legal Opinion
Bernardsville Board of Education v. J.H.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 22, 1993No. Civ. 92-3694 (CSF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.
Before the court are two motions. First is a motion brought by defendants, J.H. and E.H., individually and on behalf of their minor son, J.H., and J.H., individually, for summary judgment. Also before the court is a cross-motion brought by plaintiff, the Ber-nardsville Board of Education (BOE), for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, both defendants’ and plaintiffs motions for summary judgment are denied. FACTS
J.H. is an eighteen-year-old male. In first grade, he was referred to plaintiffs Child Study Team (CST) to be evaluated. In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rebecca H. Holmes v. Millcreek Township School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- B.K. v. Toms River Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Drinker v. Colonial School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Murphy v. Girard School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Holmes v. Millcreek Township School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.